MORGANTOWN (AP) — The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency has withdrawn a water-pollution order against a West
Virginia chicken farmer who countered the threat of hefty fines by suing
the agency over new rules aimed at cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay
watershed.
Charleston attorney David Yaussy said Friday that the
EPA recently withdrew its order against his client, Eight Is Enough
operator Lois Alt, after reviewing what he called minor changes to her
Hardy County operation. Among other things, he said, they are now moving
manure by conveyor instead of hand-loading it out.
"But the
changes were not all that significant in that the Alts had already been
running a very good, very clean operation," he said.
Alt and her
husband are thrilled they no longer face possible fines of $37,500 a day
for allegedly violating the Clean Water Act, Yaussy said, but it's
unclear what will happen to their lawsuit in U.S. District Court.
EPA
officials provided a copy of the Dec. 13 letter to Alt but did not say
Friday whether they would now move to dismiss the case.
Yaussy,
however, said the issues underlying Alt's situation still need to be
addressed in court because they could potentially affect chicken farmers
nationwide, requiring them to seek discharge permits under the Clean
Water Act that they don't all currently need.
U.S. District Judge John Preston Bailey recently allowed several environmental groups to join the litigation.
Potomac
Riverkeeper, West Virginia Rivers Coalition, Waterkeeper Alliance,
Center for Food Safety and Food & Water Watch all support the EPA's
goal of cleaning up the watershed and say Alt's farm should not be
exempt from the Clean Water Act.
Concentrated animal feeding
operations, or CAFOs, are major pollution sources that discharge
nitrogen, phosphorus and fecal bacteria into waterways the public has a
right to enjoy, they argued. Those pollutants can make waterways unsafe
for swimming and trigger algae blooms that choke off oxygen, endangering
fish and other aquatic life.
Alt sued the EPA in June,
acknowledging that there is waste-tainted runoff from her farm. But she
argues it was agricultural storm water, not "process wastewater" that
would be subject to regulation under the Clean Water Act.
Last
fall, the EPA determined that dust, feathers and fine particles of
dander and manure from Alt's poultry house ventilation fans could land
on the ground, come into contact with storm water and flow into ditches,
eventually reaching Chesapeake Bay tributaries.
The West Virginia
Farm Bureau, which was also allowed to intervene in the case along with
the American Farm Bureau, called EPA's action in the Alt situation
"stunning."
"However, EPA has not changed their position, thus
leaving other farmers in limbo regarding this issue," said spokeswoman
Joan Harman. The bureaus still believes the EPA overstepped its
authority in moving against Alt, she said, and it "cannot be allowed to
continue to do so."
The EPA is focused on protecting the
watershed, which encompasses parts of Delaware, Maryland, New York,
Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia, and all of the District of
Columbia.