WV Supreme Court case addresses union contract, unemployment - Beckley, Bluefield & Lewisburg News, Weather, Sports

WV Supreme Court case addresses union contract, unemployment

Posted: Updated:
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • Woman suffers minor injuries after car rolls on I-77 in Raleigh County

    Woman suffers minor injuries after car rolls on I-77 in Raleigh County

    Wednesday, July 30 2014 10:13 PM EDT2014-07-31 02:13:55 GMT
    Car rolled multiple times on I-77 North in Raleigh County.Car rolled multiple times on I-77 North in Raleigh County.
    In Raleigh County, a woman is miraculously not seriously injured, after her car rolls over on I-77 around 6:30 Wednesday night.An eyewitness tells us the woman was driving in the left lane on the northbound side. She suddenly veered off the road, over corrected,then slammed into the side of a tractor trailer. The car rolled multiple times before coming to a stop on it's roof.The witness says two small dogs ran out of the car. Moments later, the woman crawled out and ran after one of the dogs....
    In Raleigh County, a woman is miraculously not seriously injured, after her car rolls over on I-77 around 6:30 Wednesday night.An eyewitness tells us the woman was driving in the left lane on the northbound side. She suddenly veered off the road, over corrected,then slammed into the side of a tractor trailer. The car rolled multiple times before coming to a stop on it's roof.The witness says two small dogs ran out of the car. Moments later, the woman crawled out and ran after one of the dogs....
  • UPDATE: Suspect in custody in connection with Montcalm shooting

    UPDATE: Suspect in custody in connection with Montcalm shooting

    Thursday, July 31 2014 7:16 PM EDT2014-07-31 23:16:53 GMT
     Emotions were high in Montcalm on Thursday following a shooting. Neighbors were not surprised to hear of the shooting in their area, because they say, violence is unfortunately all too common in their neighborhood.
    Emotions were high in Montcalm on Thursday following a shooting. Neighbors were not surprised to hear of the shooting in their area, because they say, violence is unfortunately all too common in their neighborhood.
  • Environmentalists talk about Mountain Top Removal as Coal Miners Protest in Pittsburgh

    Environmentalists talk about Mountain Top Removal as Coal Miners Protest in Pittsburgh

    Thursday, July 31 2014 6:59 PM EDT2014-07-31 22:59:03 GMT
    As hundreds of coal miners protest in Pittsburgh over the hearing on E-P-A regulations, 59News talks to an Environmental group to get both sides of the controversy."Coal River Mountain Watch" is a non-profit organization organization, out of Whitesville, Raleigh County.The organizations mission is to stop the destruction of our communities and environment by mountain top removal mining, to improve the quality of life in our area and to help rebuild sustainable communities.Mike Roselle a membe...
    As hundreds of coal miners protest in Pittsburgh over the hearing on E-P-A regulations, 59News talks to an Environmental group to get both sides of the controversy."Coal River Mountain Watch" is a non-profit organization organization, out of Whitesville, Raleigh County.The organizations mission is to stop the destruction of our communities and environment by mountain top removal mining, to improve the quality of life in our area and to help rebuild sustainable communities.Mike Roselle a membe...

Can a person's unemployment benefits be governed under a collective bargaining agreement if she leaves her job, or are benefits set forth under different standards?

This is one of the questions brought forth in a West Virginia Supreme Court oral argument hearing in a case where a former Verizon Services Corp. employee left her job because she could not get child care after the company switched her shift from day to evening.

According to court documents, Verizon Services offered Loretta K. Epling the choice between two positions. She could take a job as a business consultant or another as a residential consultant.

Epling chose to work in the business consultant because the office was open from 8:30 a.m. to 5 p.m. and it would give her the chance to pick up her children from day care.

When Frontier purchased Verizon, her shift changed. In March 2010, court documents state, her employer told her she would work from noon to 8 p.m. or from 1 p.m. to 9 p.m.

Epling later left her job and filed for unemployment with WorkForce West Virginia. Her request was granted, as the WorkForce deputy concluded she left work voluntarily with good cause involving fault in the part of the employer.

Verizon argued her union signed a collective bargaining agreement and the company also sent her numerous documents informing that her hours could change.

Thus, the company appealed but an administrative law judge affirmed the deputy's decision. Verizon requested a review by the Board of Review.

The board reversed the decision, ruling Epling couldn't receive benefits because she didn't have good cause involving the fault of the employer.

Epling appealed the board's decision to Kanawha County Circuit Court. The lower court ruled that changing her hours "constituted a substantial and material change in the terms or conditions of her employment that was made unilaterally by the employer."

"Because I find that Ms. Epling left her job with good cause involving fault on the part of the employer, I need not address the petitioner's argument that she did not leave her employment voluntarily," Kanawha County Circuit Judge Paul Zakaib's order read.

Verizon appealed to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals.

The company, represented by Mark H. Dellinger, argued Epling should have been disqualified from receiving benefits because of the collective bargaining agreement.

Dellinger also argued that Verizon informed Epling that her hours could change.

"I don't take issue with the circumstances," Dellinger said, referring to Epling's need to take care of her children. "What we're saying is the expectations of this job. She was told when she came to work with Verizon that she was not hired for a particular shift. She was hired to work hours that would vary."

He said the collective bargaining agreement set forth the work hours, which are subject to the needs of the business.

"There is no substantial unilateral change to the terms of conditions of her employment, based on the change of her hours," he said. "Two weeks before she started working, she was informed in writing in multiple documents that she is not guaranteed any special work schedule."

Epling's attorney, Sarah K. Brown, argued in the Jan. 23 oral argument hearing the case isn't about whether Verizon had the authority to change her hours. 

Instead, she said the case is about whether the change in those hours constituted fault on her employer causing Epling to leave her job with good cause.

"She had a reasonable expectation and outline of job duties that she was hired in a business unit. She chose that position because of the child situation. She knew she may be required to participate in training, work weekends and overtime. She didn't know she would work a substantially different shift."

Brown noted that Epling's husband worked night shift as a coal miner and could not pick up the children. She also argued Epling tried but could not get other arrangements for child care and offered to work part-time or in another division.

"Collective bargaining certainly gives the company the right to change hours. … This brings forth the main point that the decision to change hours was not improper under the collective bargaining agreement but the statutory right to unemployment rights is under different standards," she said.

Brown argued that good cause exists when there is a unilateral change and when there are compelling circumstances.