$90.5 million verdict to head to WV Supreme Court - Beckley, Bluefield & Lewisburg News, Weather, Sports

$90.5 million verdict to head to WV Supreme Court

Posted: Updated:
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • Tazewell County Man Busted for Growing Marijuana

    Tazewell County Man Busted for Growing Marijuana

    Monday, September 1 2014 8:04 PM EDT2014-09-02 00:04:51 GMT
    Roger Lee Sparks, Jr.Roger Lee Sparks, Jr.
    A Richlands man is in custody after Tazewell County Deputies find $350,000 worth of pot, including 115 plants and more than a pound of harvested marijuana, and guns in his home.
    A Richlands man is in custody after Tazewell County Deputies find $350,000 worth of pot, including 115 plants and more than a pound of harvested marijuana, and guns in his home.
  • Officers In Tazewell County Work To Keep Your Holiday Travel Safe

    Officers In Tazewell County Work To Keep Your Holiday Travel Safe

    Monday, September 1 2014 6:50 PM EDT2014-09-01 22:50:12 GMT
    Police patrolling the roads this Labor DayPolice patrolling the roads this Labor Day
    According to AAA, 34.7 million people are expected to hit the road this Labor Day. Many police officers are out in force to keep you safe.
    According to AAA, 34.7 million people are expected to hit the road this Labor Day. Many police officers are out in force to keep you safe.
  • After fatal McDowell County crash, Troopers caution against drinking and driving over Holiday Weekend

    After fatal McDowell County crash, Troopers caution against drinking and driving over Holiday Weekend

    Monday, September 1 2014 6:00 PM EDT2014-09-01 22:00:38 GMT
    While many are safely celebrating Labor Day, State Troopers want to caution everyone about the dangers of drinking and driving.The West Virginia Department of Transportation says over the last 5 years in the Mountain State, almost 800 people have been killed in a drink driving crash just during Labor Day Weekend. Troopers released these pictures from Sunday morning's fatal crash to show the consequences drinking and driving can have.Read full story on Sunday morning's fatal crash in McDowell ...
    While many are safely celebrating Labor Day, State Troopers want to caution everyone about the dangers of drinking and driving.The West Virginia Department of Transportation says over the last 5 years in the Mountain State, almost 800 people have been killed in a drink driving crash just during Labor Day Weekend. Troopers released these pictures from Sunday morning's fatal crash to show the consequences drinking and driving can have.Read full story on Sunday morning's fatal crash in McDowell ...

A Kanawha County Circuit Court case in which the jury awarded $91.5 million to a family alleging a nursing home's neglect caused the death of a resident is once again heading to the West Virginia Supreme Court after the circuit judge recently denied nursing home attorneys' motion for a new trial.

Tom Douglas filed the suit in 2010 against Manor Care Inc., HCR Manor Care Services Inc., Healthcare and Retirement Corp. of America LLC and Heartland Employment Services LLC. Douglas alleged his 87-year-old mother, Dorothy Douglas, died as a result of severe dehydration and neglect from the nursing home.

Noting Douglas' death certificate, nursing home officials argued Douglas died from dementia, not dehydration. Officials also say Douglas was transferred to Hospice and died 18 days after she was released from Heartland.

A Kanawha County jury awarded $91.5 million to Douglas and held Heartland responsible for ordinary and medical negligence, violation of fiduciary duties and violations of the Nursing Home Act.

Approximately $11 million was awarded for the death and $80 million was awarded to punish the nursing home for misconduct.

The Kanawha County circuit judge later determined that caps did apply but only to one of these parts, reducing the verdict to $90.5 million.

Then came the first appeal to the Supreme Court. Nursing home attorneys filed for a writ of prohibition. That interrupted and stayed circuit court rulings on post-trial motions and sought to address asserted errors in a previous jury verdict form.

In a previous interview, Mike Fuller, Douglas' attorney, said defendants had opposed a previous jury verdict form in an Aug. 4 charge conference and ended up working off the plaintiff's form.

The proposed verdict form sought to address other issues outlining alleged errors in the court's decisions during trial.

State Supreme Court justices later granted the writ.

This time around in the Supreme Court, nursing home attorneys are appealing the full case and asking whether the Medical Professional Liability Act applies to nursing homes and whether it will apply to the whole verdict, not just part of it.  

In their appeal, nursing home attorneys argue the MPLA supersedes the Nursing Home Act.

"The courts in West Virginia have never accepted plaintiff's counsel's novel theory of MPLA apportionment," nursing home attorneys said in a news release. "Moreover, to our knowledge, no court anywhere has ever applied this apportionment approach to MPLA-type caps on medical malpractice liability.  

Debate surrounded the verdict award. Plaintiffs argued liability caps under the Medical Professional Liability Act would not apply to the case because the jury returned the verdict that 20 percent of the responsibility for the negligence claim dealt with medical professional negligence and 80 percent was ordinary negligence.

Therefore, plaintiffs argue, 20 percent would fall under the legislation and 80 percent would not.

Defendants, meanwhile, argued that a portion of the verdict would be reduced because it did fall under the act. In a previous hearing, attorneys argued medical professional negligence damages should be capped at $594,000.

There also was debate in that hearing whether nursing aides are classified as employees of the nursing home. If not, they would not be covered under the MPLA because it would be ordinary negligence instead of medical malpractice.

In addition to questioning the verdict amount, nursing home attorneys also say the judge erred by granting Douglas' attorneys' a verdict form that did not ask whether each defendant was individually liable.

"The statute explicitly requires the jury to answer questions about the specific liability of each defendant," the statement continued.

Nursing home attorneys also took issue with the verdict form because they say it allowed the awarding of damages to Carolyn Hoy, Douglas' daughter, who was not a party in the suit.

However, Douglas' attorney said the money would go to the children anyway and instead of specifying on the form that it would go to the estate, the money would go to the children directly. The attorney also argued that the other side did not object to the verdict form.