WV Supreme Court takes up case questioning disciplinary board ju - Beckley, Bluefield & Lewisburg News, Weather, Sports

WV Supreme Court takes up case questioning disciplinary board jurisdiction

Posted: Updated:
Photo courtesy of the West Virginia Supreme Court Photo courtesy of the West Virginia Supreme Court
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • Tazewell County Man Busted for Growing Marijuana

    Tazewell County Man Busted for Growing Marijuana

    Monday, September 1 2014 8:04 PM EDT2014-09-02 00:04:51 GMT
    Roger Lee Sparks, Jr.Roger Lee Sparks, Jr.
    A Richlands man is in custody after Tazewell County Deputies find $350,000 worth of pot, including 115 plants and more than a pound of harvested marijuana, and guns in his home.
    A Richlands man is in custody after Tazewell County Deputies find $350,000 worth of pot, including 115 plants and more than a pound of harvested marijuana, and guns in his home.
  • Officers In Tazewell County Work To Keep Your Holiday Travel Safe

    Officers In Tazewell County Work To Keep Your Holiday Travel Safe

    Monday, September 1 2014 6:50 PM EDT2014-09-01 22:50:12 GMT
    Police patrolling the roads this Labor DayPolice patrolling the roads this Labor Day
    According to AAA, 34.7 million people are expected to hit the road this Labor Day. Many police officers are out in force to keep you safe.
    According to AAA, 34.7 million people are expected to hit the road this Labor Day. Many police officers are out in force to keep you safe.
  • After fatal McDowell County crash, Troopers caution against drinking and driving over Holiday Weekend

    After fatal McDowell County crash, Troopers caution against drinking and driving over Holiday Weekend

    Monday, September 1 2014 6:00 PM EDT2014-09-01 22:00:38 GMT
    While many are safely celebrating Labor Day, State Troopers want to caution everyone about the dangers of drinking and driving.The West Virginia Department of Transportation says over the last 5 years in the Mountain State, almost 800 people have been killed in a drink driving crash just during Labor Day Weekend. Troopers released these pictures from Sunday morning's fatal crash to show the consequences drinking and driving can have.Read full story on Sunday morning's fatal crash in McDowell ...
    While many are safely celebrating Labor Day, State Troopers want to caution everyone about the dangers of drinking and driving.The West Virginia Department of Transportation says over the last 5 years in the Mountain State, almost 800 people have been killed in a drink driving crash just during Labor Day Weekend. Troopers released these pictures from Sunday morning's fatal crash to show the consequences drinking and driving can have.Read full story on Sunday morning's fatal crash in McDowell ...

Do the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board have jurisdiction to prosecute alleged state code violations against a patent lawyer, who is not a West Virginia State Bar member?

This was the question Milton patent lawyer Olen L. York presented to West Virginia Supreme Court justices in an April 24 oral argument hearing at West Virginia State University.

The WVSU argument hearing was part of the court's community outreach.

"We are happy to visit the campus of West Virginia State and to be in the company of students, faculty, administrators and neighbors," Chief Justice Brent Benjamin said in a news release.

York filed the petition for writ of prohibition against the West Virginia Office of Disciplinary Counsel and the West Virginia Lawyer Disciplinary Board.

In his petition, York said he is admitted as a licensed member of the Ohio Bar and he also was admitted to practice law before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

Additionally, York said he performed patent and trademark work as an independent contractor for the Waters Law Firm. York said he only handled these types of issues before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, representing clients from Kentucky, Ohio, Texas, California and West Virginia.

He said he never appeared in any West Virginia court.

However, the disciplinary board and the disciplinary counsel disagree, asserting they could pursue the charges because York practiced law in West Virginia.

Robert Waters, head of the Waters Law Group, later initiated a complaint against York and a statement of charges was issued against York in September 2012.

The charges stemmed from a dispute between the two over fees York earned for work he did for the firm. The statement alleged York left the Waters Law Group to work for a Charleston law firm, receiving payments for legal work he performed for two patent clients he had represented while associated with the Waters Law Group.

The statement also asserts York violated rules of professional conduct for failing to have a separate client account, failing to notify the Waters Law Group of money received by a client and failing to have an IOLTA account.

Additionally, the statement of charges alleged York commingled, misappropriated and converted funds for his own use.

York says both entities, the disciplinary board and the disciplinary counsel, do not have jurisdiction because his practice was limited to patent and trademark issues before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

"When the regulation of the practice of law by a state court conflicts with federal courts, the state court regulation is preempted by federal law, pursuant to the Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution," York argues in his petition. "In this case, because (York) was authorized by the USPTO to represent clients before that federal agency, he was authorized to take whatever actions were necessary to represent his clients, even if such actions occurred in West Virginia."

However, the disciplinary board and disciplinary counsel say they do have jurisdiction because "the practice of law in West Virginia is not limited to actions that can only be filed before a West Virginia court or tribunal, but encompasses any instance a party provides another with advice or service under circumstance which imply the possession or use of legal knowledge or skill."

Both entities say he engaged in the practice of law in the Mountain State. Thus, the court has authority to regulate and control the practice of law within state lines, the response asserts.  

"Such jurisdiction is necessary to protect the public, to reassure the public as to the reliability and integrity of attorneys, to safeguard the public interest in the administration of justice, to deter other attorneys from engaging in similar misconduct and is not in conflict with or preempted by federal law," their response asserts.