Court upholds WV Attorney General's investigatory subpoenas - Beckley, Bluefield & Lewisburg News, Weather, Sports

Court upholds WV Attorney General's investigatory subpoenas

Posted: Updated:
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • Victim identified in fatal accident near Cyclone, WV

    Victim identified in fatal accident near Cyclone, WV

    Tuesday, September 2 2014 12:01 PM EDT2014-09-02 16:01:40 GMT
    According to officials in Wyoming County, the driver was thrown from the vehicle.
    According to officials in Wyoming County, the driver was thrown from the vehicle.
  • Man accused of selling drugs near school faces jury in Tazewell, VA

    Man accused of selling drugs near school faces jury in Tazewell, VA

    Tuesday, September 2 2014 11:40 AM EDT2014-09-02 15:40:49 GMT
    A trial began in Tazewell County on Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014 for a man who is accused of selling drugs. Joseph Panagopoulas is charged with Distribution of a Schedule II Drug, Distribution on School Property and Conspiracy.
    A trial began in Tazewell County on Tuesday, Sept. 2, 2014 for a man who is accused of selling drugs. Joseph Panagopoulas is charged with Distribution of a Schedule II Drug, Distribution on School Property and Conspiracy.
  • WV Wilderness group fights against gas companies over pipeline in Pocahontas County

    WV Wilderness group fights against gas companies over pipeline in Pocahontas County

    Tuesday, September 2 2014 10:40 AM EDT2014-09-02 14:40:53 GMT
    The West Virginia Wilderness group has been fighting three gas companies for months, who want to put a pipeline in Pocahontas County .Lauren Ragland is the founder of West Virginia Wilderness and said the pipeline does not belong in Pocahontas County.
    The West Virginia Wilderness group has been fighting three gas companies for months, who want to put a pipeline in Pocahontas County .Lauren Ragland is the founder of West Virginia Wilderness and said the pipeline does not belong in Pocahontas County.
CHARLESTON, WV (AP) -

The West Virginia attorney general's investigative authority includes the power to issue subpoenas, along with questionnaires known as interrogatories specifying the type of information sought, the West Virginia Supreme Court has ruled.

The unanimous decision came in appeals of two Kanawha County Circuit Court rulings by four debt collection companies: Calvary SPV I, Calvary SPV II, Calvary Investments and Cavalry Portfolio. The Supreme Court consolidated the two cases.

In one appeal, the companies challenged the validity of an investigative subpoena issued in January 2010 by the Attorney General's Office. They argued that the office had no probable cause to issue the subpoena and that it failed to hold an administrative hearing before doing so.

In the opinion released last week, the court rejected these arguments.

"Under the facts of the case ... we find that the Attorney General amply demonstrated probable cause to believe that the Petitioners had violated, or were violating, the provisions of the West Virginia Consumer Credit and Protection Act," states the opinion, written by Justice Robin Davis.

Davis wrote that the Attorney General's Office had received several consumer complaints and other information indicating that some of the companies were collecting consumer debts without a state license or surety bond.

"Contrary to the Petitioners' assertions, the Attorney General was not required to possess concrete proof of the specific alleged wrongdoing or to describe in detail the nature of the potentially nefarious misconduct at the time he issued his investigative subpoena," Davis wrote. "Rather, the purpose of an investigative subpoena is precisely as its name implies: to investigate. Such an investigation is designed to ascertain whether a violation of the Act has, in fact, occurred so as to permit the filing of an enforcement proceeding against the alleged offender."

Davis also wrote that state law does not require an administrative hearing before the attorney general issues an investigative subpoena.

The companies also claimed that the Attorney General's Office improperly requested a court order seeking to force compliance with the subpoena after it had sued them alleging the same misconduct.

When the attorney general files a civil action, its subpoena authority ends regarding matters that form the basis of the complaint's allegations, the court ruled. But a subpoena survives the attorney general's filing of a lawsuit when it pertains to matters that don't form the basis of the complaint.

The court sent the case back to circuit court to determine whether the lawsuit supplanted any portion of the subpoena, which would make it subject to civil discovery in the case.

The second appeal had challenged a temporary injunction issued by the circuit court barring the companies from collecting any debts they acquired before they were licensed in West Virginia as debt collectors. The Supreme Court upheld the temporary injunction.

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.