3-judge panel to rule on Hardy commissioners' ouster - Beckley, Bluefield & Lewisburg News, Weather, Sports

3-judge panel to rule on Hardy commissioners' ouster

Posted: Updated:
  • Local NewsLocal NewsMore>>

  • Traffic stop in Smithers leads to prescription pill arrest

    Traffic stop in Smithers leads to prescription pill arrest

    Wednesday, August 20 2014 10:44 AM EDT2014-08-20 14:44:33 GMT
    The Fayette County Sheriff's Office announced that deputies made a drug arrest on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014 after pulling a car over on an equipment violation. Jeremy Louis Bufford, 34, of Smithers is charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver.
    The Fayette County Sheriff's Office announced that deputies made a drug arrest on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2014 after pulling a car over on an equipment violation. Jeremy Louis Bufford, 34, of Smithers is charged with Possession of a Controlled Substance with Intent to Deliver.
  • Princeton celebrates Batman's 75th year anniversary

    Princeton celebrates Batman's 75th year anniversary

    Princeton celebrates Batman's 75th year anniversary

    Wednesday, August 20 2014 9:06 AM EDT2014-08-20 13:06:20 GMT
    Mercer street in Princeton is home to many festivals throughout the year, but this time, they have a pretty unique festival hitting the streets.In honor of the 75th year anniversary of Batman, the town will celebrate.Organizers say it's not just about the super hero, but what the super hero has done for families."Some people use them as bedtimes stories for their kids. The movies, we've all grown up to see a cartoon movie or show so we all have a memory of the character," Bryan Austin said.Au...
    Mercer street in Princeton is home to many festivals throughout the year, but this time, they have a pretty unique festival hitting the streets.In honor of the 75th year anniversary of Batman, the town will celebrate.Organizers say it's not just about the super hero, but what the super hero has done for families."Some people use them as bedtimes stories for their kids. The movies, we've all grown up to see a cartoon movie or show so we all have a memory of the character," Bryan Austin said.Au...
  • WV Wilderness group fights against gas companies over pipeline in Pocahontas County

    WV Wilderness group fights against gas companies over pipeline in Pocahontas County

    Wednesday, August 20 2014 7:04 AM EDT2014-08-20 11:04:01 GMT
    The West Virginia Wilderness group has been fighting three gas companies for months, who want to put a pipeline in Pocahontas County .Lauren Ragland is the founder of West Virginia Wilderness and said the pipeline does not belong in Pocahontas County.
    The West Virginia Wilderness group has been fighting three gas companies for months, who want to put a pipeline in Pocahontas County .Lauren Ragland is the founder of West Virginia Wilderness and said the pipeline does not belong in Pocahontas County.

By MARLA PISCIOTTA

For The State Journal

A dispute between citizens of Hardy County and two county commissioners has been ongoing in the legal system for the last five months.

Residents are challenging an ambulance fee ordinance and the purchase of a building — both alleged decisions made by the commissioners without public input.

The ordinance fee currently being collected is $120 a year per resident and the building purchased was $1.13 million, which was designated to be used for ambulance and rescue squads.

The November 2013 petition, signed by 700 residents, asks that J. Michael Teets, president of the Hardy County Commission and Commissioner William E. Keplinger Jr. be ousted from the commission.

A third commissioner, A.J. Wade, was not targeted by the petition. Wade voted no on both issues.

As a result of the petition the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals appointed a three-judge panel to hear the case.

Fred L. Fox II, senior status judge from Marion County; Thomas W. Steptoe Jr., senior status judge from Jefferson County; and Robert B. Stone from Morgan County, heard the case.

The petitioner's attorney is David Judy.

Hardy County commissioners hired attorney Bridget Cohee, with Steptoe and Johnson out of Martinsburg.

Judy presented 17 witnesses and more than 100 exhibits during the hearing.

After summation, the judges took a 10-minute recess, returning to tell the attorney's to prepare an order which should include the laws pertaining to the case.

In addition, each attorney was to prepare a summary as to why the judges should rule in their favor.

Fox said the petition included not only the ousting of the commissioners, but it also included the dispute regarding ambulance fees and the county's purchase of the building.

Therefore, Fox separated those two issues from the petition leaving only the dismissal of the commissioners to be heard by the panel.

The issue of the ordinance and the building will be heard as a separate case.

In an administrative order dated March 31, 2014, Chief Justice Robin Jean Davis called for a fourth judge to hear the second part of the case against two Hardy County commissioners.

Davis ordered Lawrance S. Miller Jr., judge of the 18th Judicial Court in Preston Co., be assigned to the case — Hardy Co. Case No. 13-C-76.

Petitioners' and respondents' comments ordered by the three-judge panel were submitted last week.

The ruling is expected within 20 days from the receipt of the comments. Miller will preside over the hearing regarding the second part of the case, the ordinance and the purchase of the building.

In the meantime, regarding the $120 ambulance fee, West Virginia Attorney General Patrick Morrisey said the commissioners had a constitutional duty to manage the county's fiscal affairs, and thus collect any special fees.

The third county commissioner, Wade, said he was thankful he was not part of this case.

It will be up to Miller to decide whether to nullify the ordinance and the purchase of the building.

The West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals has ordered the Circuit Clerk of Hardy County to forward copies of all the documents pertaining to the case to Miller.

There is no date set on the court docket for the second part of the case.